Showing posts with label Edwards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Edwards. Show all posts

Monday, July 23, 2007

Edwards and the Gays

I was at rehearsal tonight so did not see the Dem YouTube debate, tough I gather from Michael at Gay Orbit I did not miss much. I did watch the clip (via Pam) of John "Bridge Over Troubled Waters" Edwards answering Rev. Longcrier's question about whether personal religious belief should be used to deny gays the right to marry. After dodging the question, he said, basically, he's personally against gay marriage, because of his faith, but doesn't think a president's personal faith should be used to deny people's civil rights.

Soooooo, that means as president, if presented a bill legalizing civil marriage for gays you'd be for it?

Artful dodging, this one. He points out wife Elizabeth is all for letting the gays marry. Could it be he's maintaining opposition, talking about that bridge he won't cross, while he lets his wife send a subliminal message to the gays that he's more with us than he can politically let on right now?

Or is that just the cynicism talking?

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Revisiting Edwards

I took Edwards to task for reportedly saying he is uncomfortable around "those people" (we homos) but a reader reminded me to consider the source:

on the other hand, Bob Shrum is hardly unbiased OR known for being a good source of (how to say this without getting sued?) uhmmm, "verifiable" information.

and he and Edwards did have a bit of an ugly falling out.


Good points. And, just as in my own family in having to ignore what my family says and instead focus on what they do, it's important to note that Edwards, in responding to an HRC questionnaire, had the most pro-gay marriage stance of the top Dem tier (via Pam):

Edwards was the only candidate among the three to address marriage equality in his document.

"Gay marriage is an issue I feel internal conflict about and I continue to struggle with it," he said in his questionnaire. "However, I believe the right president could lead the country toward consensus around equal rights and benefits for all couples in committed, long-term relationships."

Edwards also noted he supports "the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act provision that prevents the federal government from recognizing same-sex relationships.

In their documents, neither Clinton nor Obama addressed the federal Defense of Marriage Act.


You know, even we gays go through a time when we're uncomfortable about our sexuality (Hmmm, do you think....no, probably don't want to go there...) so we shouldn't be too harsh that allies struggle a bit with it.

I frankly don't like Edwards for a number of reasons but have to say he seems more pro-gay marriage than Hillary or Obama, and that's more than the gay establishment will admit.